Deliberate filmmaking

I haven’t much to say about Hickey & Boggs except that it’s got a certain kind of crime-film vibe rare today. Starring Robert Culp (who also directed) and Bill Cosby, from a script by Walter Hill, and populated with a huge range of recognizable character actors, it’s not the “caper” I half-expected from the stars. Instead, the two play rumpled, barely-surviving private eyes who collide in a case with a slew of people trying to get the loot from an old bank robbery.

For the first hour, it’s great fun — exactly the “under-appreciated gem” some Netflix user claims. The dialogue is precise and slangy, the story edited to get some intertwined plots in motion but without expository blathering. Cosby is fantastic, and Culp’s pretty good — both playing their roles low-key, tough. And the film works the slow burn — a sense of plot emerges; the characters are allowed to do human things. What I mean by “deliberate” is the sense of world-building: Hickey & Boggs is as interested in milieu and methods as it is in big reveals, and I enjoyed enormously Culp noodling about an apartment trying to find some meaningful information (and finding, as you would, a lot that is meaningless), or Cosby talking with a new client, his eyes carefully taking in details about this guy but revealing next to nothing in dialogue or action. (Did I say Cosby is great? He’s great.)

Unfortunately, once Culp has to shoot an action scene, that deliberateness goes kablooey. There’s a “big” sequence in the LA Coliseum which is confusing and very, very, very drawn-out. Lots of people watching other people, cutting around as they move in ways that further confuse where exactly they are (or where they’re going). It’s almost incompetent, and it lasts about 5 minutes–culminating in an equally-incoherent gunfight. There are later 2 other similarly crap action sequences.

But if you set your expectations low, stream the film from Netflix some evening — it was in many ways a real joy to see. The kind of film I’d delight in catching on the old cable superstations late at night…

Louie

We’ve chattered about this in passing comments in a few places, and I know some folks have been watching. I wanted to give a particular shout to an episode from a couple weeks ago, which I just saw on demand — called “Bully.” As usual, there is some very funny stand-up and some wry, off-center, also-funny stuff about his dad’s “sex talk” and about a blind date. But part way through Louis is challenged by a late-adolescent bully, and it prompts him to follow the guy home, and to confront the parents. This is pretty fucking stunning stuff: there’s a creepy and uncomfortable vibe–an anxiety as Louis follows the guy through mass transit, and the ultimate confrontation is handled with precision, a lack of big punchlines, an amazingly subtle and oblique engagement with visions of masculinity, family dynamics, class, and violence. Seeing this, I want to see LCK given a big budget and room to make longer films, to explore in longer form–’cause this isn’t just great stand-up turned into situations, it’s really strong filmmaking.

The Other Guys

I probably never laughed out loud, lost in the utter looniness as with their masterpiece Anchorman, but Adam McKay and Will Ferrell’s latest collaboration made me smile like I was riding a bear.

The only thing wrong with the film was a slight bit of drag–Hot Fuzz beat them to the loving recreation of action tropes, and even in that film I found myself wondering if I needed so exact an echo. But The Other Guys is happy to ride the bear into whatever back-alleys come along, embracing their own sublime surreality while underscoring the silly surreality of a) the performance of masculinity in cop films and b) the American fascination with rogue cops (fighting drug cartels, guns blazing) while blinking nervously then looking away from the high crimes of our financial overlords. It’s smart and it’s always funny.

The Kids Are All Right

Funny, sweet, moving–with the kind of casually-excellent and embodied acting that mutes the occasionally-too-sharp definitions of the dramedic plotline.

I’ll get the churlish out of the way. About half-way through, there’s one of those utterly-tedious establishing shots that clutter so much American film: the outside of the family home, a woman strategically walking her dog through to show us the everyday reality of the neighborhood. You can almost feel the movie’s IQ drop a couple points. And Lisa Cholodenko *does* rely upon an arc familiar to any number of comic melodramas. I found myself gritting my teeth on a couple of occasions, and overall wishing for a bit more of the actors’ counter-intuitive naturalism inflecting the plot.

But I also saw this in a big mall multiplex on a summer Saturday night, with a mostly-packed crowd. This is a film about a long-time lesbian couple, their two kids, and the raffish sperm donor father who re-enters (and massively disrupts) all of their lives. It is frank and open about a variety of desires — yet it is also a sweet film about family values, about the difficulty of living with one another–and the joys that come with such. MINOR SPOILERS AHEAD. Continue reading The Kids Are All Right

Art, motherfuckers!

The doc Art of the Steal is smart and engaging. It opens on the mayor of Philadelphia touting the move of a huge collection from a private trust into the city, and then you hear a talking head talk about this as a monumental theft. The backstory–adeptly narrated by talking heads and found footage–is that Arthur Barnes accrued an astonishing range and depth of paintings in the early part of the 20th-c, now acclaimed as the most important collection of post-Impressionist and modern works in the world. That’s key: the most important. Not the most important private trust collection–but outstripping MOMA and Getty and everyone.

And when he first put it together for a public exhibition at the Philly museum, it was roundly trounced by the snobs and elites of the city, and Barnes–already constitutionally inclined to despise the shallow trappings of high society–vowed to craft a trust that would keep the work out of the hands of the ‘morons’ who didn’t understand art. The Barnes trust was shaped as a school; visiting the collection confined to a couple of days and invitation, the collection arranged and displayed in a lovely “cluttered” series of rooms which defied many conventional approaches to display in museums.

And when Barnes died, the battle to strip the trust’s authority began. Continue reading Art, motherfuckers!

A new miscellany

I saw the pulpy and reasonably-entertaining Solomon Kane, based on a Robert E. Howard book that is not Conan the Barbarian. It is essentially Conan refashioned as a Puritan. Cool hats! But fewer loincloths. And the demons seemed pretty wussy.

I tried to watch the new Day of the Triffids, but good lord it sucked. What’s wrong with British people? I give ’em props for Quatermass and Hammer films but their version of scary is lame: walking plants, haunted tea cozies, Eddie Izzard. And apparently when plasma waves from the sun make almost everyone blind, those afflicted will run about impotently yelling and crashing into one another like the passengers in Airplane. Stiff upper lip, my ass.

Crazy Stone

Ning Hao’s 2006 heist film was shot on dv for a song, but damn the film sings. The low-rent production and high-concept pitch (it’s Ocean’s Eleven in China) both fade from memory a few moments in. Yes, it’s a heist film–but it’s also a parody of heist films. Where Soderbergh’s slick cons run elaborate, high-tech scams on gangsters with deep pockets, here a rare jade (found during digging at a small-time factory) is guarded by a dedicated but woefully unresourced security chief, and sought by a couple of crews of generally half-assed thieves. (There is one high-profile expert jewel thief, and his smarts get him nowhere.)

The film is also technically devious–Ning often shows us an event, then cuts to another scene which we slowly realize is a rewind, bringing us back into the earlier event from another angle. There’s split-screen play, some loopy and glorious foot-chases. The filmmaking is joyous, the acting just as playful. I can’t recall how I came upon this, but it was great good fun, and I’m going to watch Ning’s earlier film and keep an eye out for those coming….

Collapse

I watched Collapse, Chris Smith’s latest documentary about the debbie-downer Michael Ruppert. The film suffers from a serious Errol-Morris fixation, right down to its Glassesque soundtrack–and such parroting aggravated me no end. (I love Morris’ docs, so there are worse crimes than mimicking excellence, but Smith is no newbie. Why?)

And the film itself is all one chain-smoking rant after another, interwoven with portentous blackout interludes (works), feverish archive footage underlaid over the rants (works), and a typewriter clacking out various key terms or ideas (doesn’t work). I’ve read some very credulous reviews–Roger Ebert, who should know fucking better–raving about the film’s horrifying predictions. But I was engaged, primarily by how the film keeps its object “collapse” a question–is it the world’s economy, peak oil, modern technology . . . or is it Michael Ruppert’s?

I read a lot of conspiracy theories in doing my graduate work, and that intense passionate fury and worry is all too familiar to me. But I still find it so compelling: how and why do various personal experiences and traits find meaning–and a purchase for securing identity–in visions so all-consumingly dark and destructive?

Which is not to simply dismiss Ruppert’s predictions. His corrosive critique of the unsustainability of our oil-driven economy is, indeed, a compelling horrorshow … It was so horrible, I decided not to eat any ice cream today, in solidarity. But I’m more interested by the film’s portrait of the believer than by the sermon itself.

Horror reboots

I haven’t gotten out to any of the “big” films yet this summer, and aside from reliable ol’ Pixar every option sounds like a gamble. I did take a contractually-obligated trip to the new Karate Kid, which I ended up liking quite fine–almost as much as the two boys who I took–and mainly because Jackie Chan is such an affecting, engaging Miyagi replacement. But, while a reboot, it ain’t horror.

Vincenzo Natali’s Splice,however,is horrific, in (alas) too many ways. Continue reading Horror reboots

Edge of D……

The latest Mel Gibson film is a welcome return to a grim ………………………I’m sorry what? What’s the–why are you here? Oh. I … I dozed off there. Oh. Oh yes–the Gibson film! Right, it was a move in the right direction, all that revenge stuff making Gibs…….

……………………

………….Huh? Was it–did–again? I am so sorry. This film seems to induce……

………..yes?

I’d say this was a bad film but an excellent narcotic.